← Home

Filxpw

📍 Poland
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 417,160 / 20,000 XP
2,840 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Angmar
RotWKMAIN
Mordor
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Show all 7
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1053
ELO
#161
109W 89L · 55%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#188
2W 0L · 100%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
marabouoff
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
marabouoff
1W 0L
100%
krabovoz
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Filxpw & marabouoff
1W 0L
100%
Filxpw & krabovoz
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Minisauron & Pichi_AI
2W 0L
100%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1047
  • Opponent rating: 1125.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1042
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:26:17·2026-10-11 12:27 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1039
  • Opponent rating: 1091.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1033
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:25:03·2026-09-29 16:52 UTC
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1040
  • Opponent rating: 1247.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1039
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:12:51·2026-08-26 10:11 UTC
vs Orcy
LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1040
  • Opponent rating: 965.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1030
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:23:11·2026-08-16 17:22 UTC
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1039
  • Opponent rating: 1111.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1034
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:09:53·2026-08-16 17:03 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1046
  • Opponent rating: 1094.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1039
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:41·2026-08-16 10:33 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Opponent rating: 1135.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1039
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:08:12·2026-08-16 10:15 UTC
LRotWKDunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1035
  • Opponent rating: 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1028
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:11:54·2026-08-14 14:24 UTC
vs Gate
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Opponent rating: 1078.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 990
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:03:56·2026-08-13 19:02 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1073.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 995
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:19:11·2026-08-13 18:40 UTC