← Home

Hero2hp

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1800 / 2,000 XP
1,200 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Goblins
RotWK

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
992
ELO
#261
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#885
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
991
ELO
#483
2W 3L · 40%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#565
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
968
ELO
#793
0W 5L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
I Won It
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
OandAShow
0W 3L
0%
Aragornn
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Hero2hp & I Won It
1W 0L
100%
Hero2hp & ManOnEdge
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Bones91 & Schwoam
1W 0L
100%
Bones91 & muro16
1W 0L
100%
31 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Andrast IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:20:33·2026-09-18 12:13 UTC
LBFME1HarlondHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 1094 against 1057.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 991
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:11:27·2026-09-18 11:58 UTC
LBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1006
  • Team average: 1038 against 1113.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1001
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:02:48·2026-09-18 11:53 UTC
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 989.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:03:28·2026-09-14 16:45 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 975
  • Team average: 1018 against 1065.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 968
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:52·2026-09-14 16:13 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Team average: 989 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 975
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:35·2026-09-14 15:58 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 986
  • Team average: 1030 against 1116.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 981
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:14·2026-09-04 20:54 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 996
  • Team average: 1017 against 981.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 986
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:25:39·2026-09-03 20:39 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 980 against 1074.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 996
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:11·2026-09-03 20:24 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:08:19·2026-09-03 20:12 UTC