← Home

Ignitius

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 414,300 / 20,000 XP
5,700 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Rohan
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
1010
ELO
#236
3W 3L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1002
ELO
#300
6W 6L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
999
ELO
#326
5W 5L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
999
ELO
#91
1W 5L · 17%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#322
#322
Season 1
1,002 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#225
#225
Season 1
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
McBraavos
5W 1L, 83% over 6 games
McBraavos
5W 1L
83%
ZooMp
3W 3L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Ignitius & ZooMp
3W 3L
50%
Ignitius & RedBracket
3W 3L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Mcbels & RedBracket
1W 2L
33%
RedBracket & ZooMp
1W 2L
33%
69 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1017
  • Opponent rating: 1057.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1010
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:18:11·2026-10-17 21:34 UTC
LBFME1Harondor NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Team average: 1012 against 1153.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1002
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:10·2026-10-17 20:15 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1005 against 946.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 997
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:30:11·2026-10-15 12:07 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1005
  • Team average: 965 against 1105.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1003
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:03·2026-10-13 17:53 UTC
LBFME1HarlondHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 998
  • Team average: 999 against 991.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 989
Rohan·2 versus 2·00:13:49·2026-10-13 17:37 UTC
LBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Team average: 1008 against 1061.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 998
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:11:02·2026-10-13 17:04 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1010
  • Team average: 965 against 996.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1003
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:21·2026-09-30 17:06 UTC
LBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1005
  • Team average: 1002 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 996
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:21·2026-09-30 12:06 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 997
  • Team average: 1031 against 1120.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 993
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:44·2026-09-30 11:41 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 992 against 1117.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 997
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:59·2026-09-30 11:23 UTC