← Home

Kisielikos

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 24,410 / 5,000 XP
590 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Show all 7
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
966
ELO
#905
1W 7L · 12%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
804
ELO
#1796
5W 45L · 10%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1108
#1108
Season 1
959 pts
1W / 7L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
wubbalub
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
HandyC4P
0W 2L
0%
wubbalub
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
HandyC4P & Kisielikos
0W 2L
0%
Kisielikos & wubbalub
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Kyagara & _Gimli_
0W 3L
0%
DinoM & Trachowski
1W 0L
100%
14 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 814
  • Opponent rating: 755.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 804
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:09:18·2026-07-30 13:24 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 822
  • Opponent rating: 832.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 814
Elves·1 versus 1·00:18:48·2026-07-03 18:32 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 831
  • Opponent rating: 825.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 822
Men·1 versus 1·00:16:59·2026-07-01 19:04 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 840
  • Opponent rating: 847.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 831
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:51·2026-07-01 10:17 UTC
LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 849
  • Opponent rating: 854.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 840
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:42:31·2026-06-28 13:03 UTC
LRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 850
  • Opponent rating: 1068.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 849
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:59·2026-06-28 12:53 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 851
  • Opponent rating: 1112.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 850
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:53·2026-06-19 12:09 UTC
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 852
  • Opponent rating: 1111.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 851
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:22·2026-06-19 12:01 UTC
WRotWKNorth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 843
  • Opponent rating: 841.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 852
Goblins·1 versus 1·01:00:34·2026-06-18 14:08 UTC
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 847
  • Opponent rating: 942.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 843
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:12·2026-06-15 21:50 UTC