← Home

MMKB

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 413,110 / 20,000 XP
6,890 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Angmar
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Show all 7
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
1062
ELO
#10
16W 8L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1027
ELO
#17
3W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#200
2W 1L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
982
ELO
#146
0W 2L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Matty
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
DrThrax
6W 4L
60%
FlyingCow
7W 2L
78%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DrThrax & Excelsior & leslotje & MMKB
1W 1L
50%
Bambo & DrThrax & FlyingCow & MMKB
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Loop & Matty & Poero & Turin
1W 0L
100%
Bambo & FlyingCow & The Fallen & Turin
1W 0L
100%
60 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·Free for all (4p)·01:02:13·2025-12-31 01:05 UTC
LRotWKEryn RhunHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·Free for all (4p)·00:28:32·2025-12-31 00:33 UTC
LRotWKStaddleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Team average: 1011 against 1011.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1054
Mordor·4 versus 4·00:11:57·2025-12-30 23:28 UTC
LRotWKSouth DownsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1045
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1036
Goblins·4 versus 4·00:19:54·2025-12-28 22:40 UTC
LRotWKLanthir LamathHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1027
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:14:54·2025-12-27 22:39 UTC
LRotWKWest RohanHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:18:19·2025-12-27 20:53 UTC
LRotWKUdunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1004 against 1027.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:08:18·2025-12-13 22:53 UTC
LRotWKLower DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:09:33·2025-12-12 21:53 UTC
LRotWKSouth DownsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1002 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Mordor·4 versus 4·00:27:38·2025-12-12 20:51 UTC
LRotWKLanthir LamathHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Mordor·4 versus 4·00:09:59·2025-12-12 19:57 UTC