← Home
Mex Flaxtz
📍 Switzerland
LEVEL
Level 7126,170 / 130,000 XP
3,830 XP to level 8
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 12
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
125W 88L · 59%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
7W 4L · 64%
BFME1Legends of the 3rd Age · 1 versus 1
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
0W 1L · 0%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#106
Season 1
1,048 pts
78W / 59L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
LoroParque
6W 3L, 67% over 9 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Mex Flaxtz & Spartaco Gamer
3W 5L
38%
LoroParque & Mex Flaxtz
4W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
P B R & Qataraqt
2W 0L
100%
kot123 & TaraNtuJla & TopBelarus
1W 1L
50%
46 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Bane of the Enemy
Level 2 of 3
1.3% of players
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
Lord of the Mark
Level 3 of 4
1.2% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
The Deep Places
only 31 players
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
The Wide World
only 44 players
Warden of Patch 2.02
only 55 players
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1102
- Opponent rating: 1284.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1101
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:00:02·2026-10-16 17:10 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1103
- Opponent rating: 1283.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1102
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:00:36·2026-10-16 17:05 UTC 
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1105
- Opponent rating: 1247.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1103
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:00:37·2026-10-16 16:59 UTC 
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1107
- Opponent rating: 1245.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1105
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:00:38·2026-10-16 16:56 UTC 
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1100
- Opponent rating: 1064.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1107
Men·1 versus 1·00:23:08·2026-10-13 20:57 UTC
LRotWKWoodmen TownHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 1008 against 974.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1019
Goblins·2 versus 2·00:33:58·2026-10-09 21:42 UTC 
WRotWKFar HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1019
- Team average: 998 against 1034.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1029
Goblins·2 versus 2·00:13:29·2026-10-09 21:26 UTC WRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1091
- Opponent rating: 1094.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1100
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:23:45·2026-10-08 16:36 UTC 
WRotWKMisty MountainsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1090
- Opponent rating: 869.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1091
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:18:34·2026-10-07 19:04 UTC 
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1083
- Opponent rating: 1046.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1090
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:14:39·2026-10-07 18:45 UTC
