← Home

Morkoving

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 416,170 / 20,000 XP
3,830 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Goblins
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
992
ELO
#439
1W 2L · 33%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
985
ELO
#1113
18W 23L · 44%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#177
#177
Season 1
1,007 pts
42W / 33L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
JorlDain
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
JorlDain
1W 0L
100%
wowowowow
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
JorlDain & Morkoving
1W 0L
100%
Morkoving & wowowowow
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
R8sseauu & YTRE
1W 0L
100%
Aupif & RTOZZZZZZZ
0W 1L
0%
6 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 996
  • Opponent rating: 753.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 997
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:45·2026-09-04 14:50 UTC
WRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 986
  • Opponent rating: 1049.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 996
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:16·2026-08-30 20:09 UTC
WRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Opponent rating: 901.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 995
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:03·2026-08-30 02:40 UTC
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Opponent rating: 1015.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:41·2026-08-29 16:23 UTC
WRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Opponent rating: 1024.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 988
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:39·2026-08-29 13:51 UTC
WRotWKRiver NimrodelHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Opponent rating: 1005.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 982
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:22·2026-08-29 01:19 UTC
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Opponent rating: 972.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 987
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:16·2026-08-27 22:27 UTC
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Opponent rating: 934.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 978
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:22:39·2026-08-27 21:05 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 962
  • Opponent rating: 977.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 971
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:14:40·2026-08-27 19:47 UTC
WRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Opponent rating: 976.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 978
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:02·2026-08-27 18:39 UTC