← HomeNicobif
📍 Unknown
LEVEL
Level 8131,140 / 200,000 XP
68,860 XP to level 9
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
303W 264L · 53%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1W 1L · 50%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#131
Season 1
1,034 pts
92W / 85L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Baikal
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Baikal & Nicobif
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
GolDpyros & TheKing
0W 2L
0%
GolDpyros & MayShadowFax
0W 2L
0%
21 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
Loremaster
only 116 players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Bane of the Enemy
Level 2 of 3
1.3% of players
Lord of the Mark
Level 3 of 4
1.3% of players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 152 players
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Race of Men
only 44 players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players
Warden of Patch 2.02
only 59 players
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1042
- Opponent rating: 1078.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1035
Men1 versus 100:11:152026-11-02 21:13 UTC
WRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1033
- Opponent rating: 1028.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1042
Men1 versus 101:07:482026-11-01 10:10 UTC 
LRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1039
- Opponent rating: 1093.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1033
Men1 versus 100:15:192026-10-31 22:09 UTC 
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1046
- Opponent rating: 1086.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1039
Mordor1 versus 100:18:542026-10-31 21:48 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1052
- Opponent rating: 1116.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1046
Mordor1 versus 100:18:592026-10-29 19:41 UTC 
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1045
- Opponent rating: 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1052
Mordor1 versus 100:07:062026-10-29 19:32 UTC 
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1036
- Opponent rating: 1063.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1045
Mordor1 versus 100:15:152026-10-29 19:13 UTC 
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1046
- Opponent rating: 1015.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1036
Goblins1 versus 100:54:262026-10-28 18:12 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1054
- Opponent rating: 1079.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1046
Goblins1 versus 100:31:482026-10-28 10:53 UTC WRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1048
- Opponent rating: 980.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1054
Isengard1 versus 100:06:572026-10-28 10:44 UTC
