← HomeLEVEL
Level 530,990 / 40,000 XP
9,010 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7

Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
166W 124L · 57%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
3W 1L · 75%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#338
Season 1
1,000 pts
3W / 2L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Ar3sis
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Ar3sis & OldLegend
2W 0L
100%
OldLegend & Osin
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Bredrik & matyasss
2W 0L
100%
Iconic & Wuelloem
1W 0L
100%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players

LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1100
- Opponent rating: 1136.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1093
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:25:54·2026-10-19 10:24 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1102
- Opponent rating: 1246.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1100
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:48·2026-10-19 10:13 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1112
- Opponent rating: 1083.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1102
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:52:07·2026-10-18 09:44 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1110
- Opponent rating: 1164.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1104
Elves·1 versus 1·00:24:51·2026-10-18 08:47 UTC
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1099
- Opponent rating: 1167.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1093
Elves·1 versus 1·00:12:34·2026-10-15 17:10 UTC
LRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1106
- Opponent rating: 1139.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1099
Elves·1 versus 1·00:09:42·2026-10-15 07:42 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1110
- Opponent rating: 1190.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1105
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:12:44·2026-10-14 19:10 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1116
- Opponent rating: 1184.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1110
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:17:57·2026-10-14 18:51 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1122
- Opponent rating: 1178.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1116
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:13:29·2026-10-14 18:35 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1119
- Opponent rating: 1081.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1109
Elves·1 versus 1·00:22:12·2026-10-14 15:16 UTC