← Home

Po0L

📍 Italy
some water, very clean
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 412,650 / 20,000 XP
7,350 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Goblins
RotWKMAIN
Elves
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Show all 7
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1263
ELO
#30
56W 7L · 89%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1009
ELO
#46
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
998
ELO
#48
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
955
ELO
#188
12W 17L · 41%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Bark
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Matty
7W 9L
44%
Excelsior
4W 6L
40%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Excelsior & Matty & Po0L & Toxic
0W 2L
0%
Glaurung & HaroonZ & Matty & Po0L
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
.B.R. & Bredrik & Excelsior & ikkitousen
1W 0L
100%
DrThrax & Feanor & Orcy & Truck
1W 0L
100%
58 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 20 games in a row. The Beacons Are Lit · 7 Aug 2026 Flame of Anor · 5 Sep 2026
Flame of Anor
Level 2 of 3
1.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKLower Iron HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·4 versus 4·00:25:34·2026-10-07 22:36 UTC
WRotWKDwarrowdelfHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·4 versus 4·00:14:29·2026-10-07 22:20 UTC
WRotWKDesert of RhunHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·4 versus 4·00:18:40·2026-10-04 13:48 UTC
LRotWKAdorn RiverHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·4 versus 4·00:15:32·2026-10-04 13:29 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1282
  • Opponent rating: 1033.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1283
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:09:19·2026-10-04 12:46 UTC
WRotWKNanduhirionHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:16:34·2026-10-02 16:46 UTC
LRotWKLower DunlandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:42:41·2026-09-29 14:57 UTC
WRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1281
  • Opponent rating: 1020.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1282
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:07:56·2026-09-27 12:19 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1277
  • Opponent rating: 1171.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1281
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:00:12·2026-09-27 12:17 UTC
WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1271
  • Opponent rating: 1211.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1277
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:15:31·2026-09-27 09:59 UTC