← Home

Sakura

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 39,300 / 10,000 XP
700 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
992
ELO
#526
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
P0wys
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
mk today
40W 66L
38%
otabok
4W 12L
25%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
mk today & Sakura
22W 31L
42%
mk today & otabok & Sakura
4W 9L
31%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
1magomedov6 & BamBuk & radzhab500
2W 2L
50%
Frodo & PASTOR
0W 4L
0%
57 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:36·2026-01-13 15:53 UTC
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:44:27·2026-01-13 14:55 UTC
WBFME1AnfalasHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3·00:15:44·2025-12-25 23:52 UTC
WBFME1Fields of Edhellond NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:15:10·2025-12-25 22:58 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:08:34·2025-12-25 22:42 UTC
WBFME1Emyn ArnenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:43·2025-12-25 21:59 UTC
WBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:15·2025-02-24 14:46 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:13:07·2025-02-21 15:18 UTC
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:04:46·2025-02-20 14:02 UTC
WBFME1Druadan Forest 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:23:28·2025-02-20 13:37 UTC