← Home

SatoshiRyu

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,100 / 2,000 XP
900 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Harad
RotWKMAIN
Goblins
RotWK
Gondor
RotWK
Mordor
BFME1
Angmar
RotWK

LAST 5 SEASONS

Ennorath
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#745
#745
Season 1
918 pts
1W / 11L
2026-10-28
Ennorath
2 versus 2 · RotWK
BEST
#73
#73
Season 1
992 pts
1W / 2L
2026-10-28

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Furamir
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Furamir
1W 0L
100%
Numenor.
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Furamir & SatoshiRyu
1W 0L
100%
Numenor. & SatoshiRyu
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
astartes1 & PTU_Lezyok
1W 0L
100%
astartes1 & Furamir
0W 1L
0%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
Enter a tournament.
Called to the Lists
Level 1 of 2
1.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKEryn Rhun IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:26:03·2026-06-11 16:04 UTC
LRotWKOst-in-EdhilHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Harad·2 versus 2·00:04:56·2026-06-11 15:56 UTC
LRotWKEryn Rhun IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:32:46·2026-06-11 14:18 UTC
LRotWKHollin IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 926
  • Opponent rating: 953.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 918
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:07:15·2026-06-08 11:18 UTC
LRotWKFord of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 936
  • Opponent rating: 899.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 926
Harad·1 versus 1·00:28:27·2026-05-27 18:19 UTC
LRotWKFord of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Opponent rating: 889.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 936
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:19:40·2026-05-27 17:58 UTC
LRotWKLossarnach IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 956
  • Opponent rating: 893.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 946
Harad·1 versus 1·00:22:28·2026-05-19 16:25 UTC
LRotWKFord of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Opponent rating: 1002.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 956
Harad·1 versus 1·00:13:59·2026-05-11 12:40 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Opponent rating: 1027.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 963
Harad·1 versus 1·00:24:09·2026-03-05 09:58 UTC
LRotWKFar Downs*How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 975
  • Opponent rating: 1037.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 969
Harad·1 versus 1·00:10:44·2026-02-26 14:23 UTC