← Home
Schere
📍 Unknown
LEVEL
Level 8150,520 / 200,000 XP
49,480 XP to level 9
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
291W 221L · 57%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
20W 19L · 51%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#127
Season 1
1,035 pts
400W / 390L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
winnible
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
LoroParque & Spartaco Gamer
2W 1L
67%
EmpOfSands & Tarindor
2W 0L
100%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Bane of the Enemy
Level 2 of 3
1.3% of players
Durin's Folk
only 27 players
Lord of the Mark
Level 3 of 4
1.2% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
The Race of Men
only 43 players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
The White Hand
only 75 players
Warden of Patch 2.02
only 55 players
Years of the Trees
Level 2 of 3
only 111 players
LRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 998 against 1032.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1000
Men·2 versus 2·00:11:33·2026-10-26 16:31 UTC
LRotWKMisty MountainsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1077
- Opponent rating: 1084.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1068
Men·1 versus 1·00:16:20·2026-10-26 15:19 UTC 
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1081
- Opponent rating: 1007.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1071
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:04:44·2026-10-26 14:56 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1091
- Opponent rating: 1050.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1081
Men·1 versus 1·00:49:36·2026-10-25 07:35 UTC 
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1088
- Opponent rating: 1274.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1087
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:21:41·2026-10-24 20:00 UTC
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1094
- Opponent rating: 1151.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1088
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:22·2026-10-24 16:56 UTC 
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1084
- Opponent rating: 1050.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1074
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:12·2026-10-23 18:16 UTC LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1079
- Opponent rating: 1048.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1069
Men·1 versus 1·00:29:31·2026-10-23 08:34 UTC LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1084
- Opponent rating: 1154.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1079
Men·1 versus 1·00:00:12·2026-10-23 08:09 UTC 
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1082
- Opponent rating: 1127.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1075
Men·1 versus 1·00:37:55·2026-10-22 15:39 UTC
