← Home

SeekFirst

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,660 / 5,000 XP
2,340 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1054
ELO
#159
18W 2L · 90%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#144
2W 1L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
1000
ELO
#71
3W 3L · 50%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
LeoBonhart
3W 1L, 75% over 4 games
LeoBonhart
3W 1L
75%
ikkitousen
2W 1L
67%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
SeekFirst & Tourin
1W 0L
100%
Glaurung & Iconic & LeoBonhart & SeekFirst
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
BananenBro & RussianBear69
1W 0L
100%
Naderr & Pivas & The Fallen & Tomasss
1W 0L
100%
25 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.1% of players
Have 50 friends. The Fellowship · 7 Aug 2026 Host of the West · 8 Aug 2026
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKPlains of RohanHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1010
  • Team average: 995 against 1005.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1001
Elves·2 versus 2·00:19:31·2026-10-14 21:49 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1059
  • Opponent rating: 974.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1064
Elves·1 versus 1·00:10:52·2026-10-14 21:34 UTC
WRotWKFar HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1028.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1010
Elves·2 versus 2·00:06:28·2026-10-14 21:25 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1049
  • Opponent rating: 1089.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1059
Elves·1 versus 1·00:20:46·2026-10-12 02:44 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Opponent rating: 982.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1049
Elves·1 versus 1·00:13:33·2026-10-12 02:27 UTC
WRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Opponent rating: 1049.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1043
Elves·1 versus 1·00:16:31·2026-10-12 02:02 UTC
WRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1026
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1034
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:17·2026-10-12 01:44 UTC
LRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1033
  • Opponent rating: 1076.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1026
Elves·1 versus 1·00:19:37·2026-10-12 01:21 UTC
vs NZT-
LRotWKEastfarthing HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·4 versus 4·00:29:27·2026-10-11 22:36 UTC
WRotWKLower DunlandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·4 versus 4·00:15:01·2026-10-11 22:14 UTC