← Home

Solor

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,900 / 5,000 XP
2,100 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Angmar
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Show all 7
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
992
ELO
#521
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#958
0W 2L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#673
#673
Season 1
991 pts
1W / 2L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
ptr42
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
ptr42
0W 1L
0%
OHTAKEOVER
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
ptr42 & Solor
0W 1L
0%
OHTAKEOVER & Solor
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Petit_Bato & YTRE
0W 1L
0%
Gurte & krabovoz
0W 1L
0%
4 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.
LRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 996
  • Opponent rating: 1083.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 991
Dwarves1 versus 100:12:532026-10-08 16:17 UTC
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1105.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 996
Mordor1 versus 100:07:582026-10-08 16:03 UTC
vs Ryzens
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:27:522026-03-01 15:21 UTC
LRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 986 against 1005.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Angmar2 versus 200:24:302026-02-20 19:28 UTC
WRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:12:182026-02-19 20:11 UTC
vs ShumiX
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:29:052026-02-13 16:35 UTC
vs brkhn
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:36:312025-12-23 20:14 UTC
LRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves2 versus 200:06:412025-07-18 00:16 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:35:072025-07-17 22:53 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins1 versus 100:09:412025-07-17 22:40 UTC