← Home

ptr42

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 419,500 / 20,000 XP
500 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
993
ELO
#671
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
992
ELO
#447
32W 33L · 49%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#933
#933
Season 1
981 pts
72W / 84L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
likenet
8W 3L, 73% over 11 games
likenet
8W 3L
73%
BananenBro
4W 2L
67%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
likenet & ptr42
8W 3L
73%
BananenBro & ptr42
4W 2L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
likenet & YTRE
3W 3L
50%
BananenBro & VolkorBro
3W 2L
60%
56 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1038.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:42·2026-07-21 16:01 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:36·2026-03-17 17:00 UTC
LRotWKFirien WoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 1030 against 1079.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 992
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:15:58·2026-03-13 21:58 UTC
LRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Team average: 997 against 1069.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 999
Elves·2 versus 2·00:14:58·2026-03-05 23:05 UTC
WRotWKUdunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 996
  • Team average: 994 against 979.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1004
Men·2 versus 2·00:07:25·2026-03-05 22:47 UTC
WRotWKFirien WoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 987
  • Team average: 984 against 988.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 996
Men·2 versus 2·00:13:01·2026-03-05 22:31 UTC
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:11:54·2026-03-05 21:17 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:21:09·2026-03-04 22:20 UTC
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:49·2026-03-04 21:54 UTC
WRotWKUpper LebenninHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Team average: 981 against 976.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 987
Goblins·2 versus 2·00:11:15·2026-03-04 21:12 UTC