← Home

StOrM1248

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1720 / 2,000 XP
1,280 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1009
ELO
#36
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
974
ELO
#1439
2W 7L · 22%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Gurte
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Gurte
1W 0L
100%
-Fenix-
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
-Fenix- & Gurte & StOrM1248
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Bredrik & Did_Vidun & krabovoz
1W 0L
100%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Opponent rating: 991.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 974
Men·1 versus 1·00:11:34·2026-08-09 18:26 UTC
WRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 956
  • Opponent rating: 953.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 965
Men·1 versus 1·00:37:06·2026-08-07 18:06 UTC
vs Ando
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 960
  • Opponent rating: 1049.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 956
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:24·2026-08-06 20:32 UTC
LRotWKRiver CelonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Opponent rating: 1047.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 960
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:04:56·2026-08-06 20:22 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 970
  • Opponent rating: 1055.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:40·2026-08-06 19:43 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Opponent rating: 947.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 970
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:35·2026-08-06 18:52 UTC
LRotWKRiver NimrodelHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 987
  • Opponent rating: 1024.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 980
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:42·2026-08-06 18:38 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 993
  • Opponent rating: 1046.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 987
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:41·2026-08-06 10:51 UTC
WRotWKRiver LangwellHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1001.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Elves·3 versus 3·00:27:26·2026-08-05 20:35 UTC
LRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1040.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:05:26·2026-08-05 20:15 UTC