← Home

The Fallen

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,540 / 2,000 XP
460 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Mordor
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Show all 7
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
997
ELO
#338
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
991
ELO
#89
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
979
ELO
#1275
2W 5L · 29%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
973
ELO
#174
0W 3L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#238
#238
Season 1
1,000 pts
2W / 2L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Glaurung
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Glaurung
0W 1L
0%
SeekFirst
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Felipemito & Glaurung & SeekFirst & The Fallen
0W 1L
0%
Naderr & Pivas & The Fallen & Tomasss
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
LeoBonhart & Makaa & Pivas & Tomasss
0W 1L
0%
Glaurung & Iconic & LeoBonhart & SeekFirst
0W 1L
0%
12 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Have 50 friends. The Fellowship · 7 Aug 2026 Host of the West · 12 Sep 2026
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKEastfarthing HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:29:27·2026-10-11 22:36 UTC
LRotWKLower DunlandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:15:01·2026-10-11 22:14 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 986
  • Opponent rating: 1026.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 979
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:26:55·2026-10-11 03:36 UTC
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 987
  • Opponent rating: 1131.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 986
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:17:26·2026-10-10 07:03 UTC
LRotWKUpper LebenninHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 964 against 1078.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 997
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:11:35·2026-09-29 23:25 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Opponent rating: 1024.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 987
Men·1 versus 1·00:14:26·2026-05-23 06:19 UTC
LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Opponent rating: 1032.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 995
Elves·1 versus 1·00:08:27·2026-05-23 06:03 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Opponent rating: 958.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1003
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:19:46·2026-05-23 05:42 UTC
WRotWKNorth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Opponent rating: 952.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1013
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:13:32·2026-05-20 07:15 UTC
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 959.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1007
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:04·2026-05-20 06:59 UTC