← HomeLEVEL
Level 641,870 / 80,000 XP
38,130 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
2W 2L · 50%
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
nameless
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
GolDpyros & The Chad
2W 1L
67%
nameless & The Chad
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
bloedijahn & Elbu
2W 0L
100%
Lira_Redai & TheKing
0W 2L
0%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Firstborn
only 30 players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players

WRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:22:21·2025-10-07 21:08 UTC
WRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:27:48·2025-10-07 20:39 UTC
WRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:28:29·2025-10-07 20:06 UTC
WRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:43·2025-10-07 19:53 UTC
WRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:40:52·2025-10-07 18:53 UTC
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:59:15·2025-10-04 21:42 UTC
WRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 996.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:25·2025-10-04 21:13 UTC
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·01:07:06·2025-10-04 19:59 UTC
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:41:37·2025-10-03 23:02 UTC
WRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:47:56·2025-10-03 22:12 UTC