← Home

Tigr

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 38,270 / 10,000 XP
1,730 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Gondor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Imladris
RotWK
Harad
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKEnnorath · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#44
2W 2L · 50%
RotWKEnnorath · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#91
38W 35L · 52%
RotWKEnnorath · FFA
931
ELO
#38
1W 9L · 10%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
VestnikZla
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Nikolaaas
1W 1L
50%
VestnikZla
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Nikolaaas & Tigr
1W 1L
50%
Tigr & VestnikZla
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
frodo1994 & VestnikZla
1W 1L
50%
frodo1994 & Nikolaaas
1W 0L
100%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Have 50 friends. The Fellowship · 7 Aug 2026 Host of the West · 7 Aug 2026
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKFords of Isen (Unlame)How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1048
  • Opponent rating: 1032.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1056
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:56·2026-08-20 20:09 UTC
WRotWKTroll-fells*How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1039
  • Opponent rating: 1040.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1048
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:18:10·2026-08-20 19:47 UTC
vs nobs
WRotWKFirien daleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1048
  • Opponent rating: 1051.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1057
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:59·2026-08-20 18:04 UTC
WRotWKLossarnach IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1044
  • Opponent rating: 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1053
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:37·2026-08-19 18:24 UTC
vs AiLi
WRotWKTroll-fells*How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Opponent rating: 1080.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1044
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:27:04·2026-08-18 18:39 UTC
WRotWKFord of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1029
  • Opponent rating: 949.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1034
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:37·2026-08-16 22:08 UTC
WRotWKHollin IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1024
  • Opponent rating: 954.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1029
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:29·2026-08-16 21:51 UTC
WRotWKRhudaurHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Opponent rating: 985.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1049
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:25:18·2026-08-15 19:59 UTC
vs AiLi
WRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1033
  • Opponent rating: 1064.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1043
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:34:49·2026-08-15 19:06 UTC
WRotWKMering streamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1037
  • Opponent rating: 966.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1042
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:47·2026-08-15 14:28 UTC