← Home

TwoConcept

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 415,270 / 20,000 XP
4,730 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Elves
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Show all 7
Men
RotWK

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1091
ELO
#57
30W 17L · 64%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
997
ELO
#198
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
994
ELO
#449
4W 4L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
993
ELO
#428
2W 3L · 40%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#388
#388
Season 1
996 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#334
#334
Season 1
998 pts
1W / 1L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
XaYaBi
29W 12L, 71% over 41 games
XaYaBi
29W 12L
71%
Menga Px
2W 5L
29%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
TwoConcept & XaYaBi
8W 4L
67%
TwoConcept & Vitamin_
3W 2L
60%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
abbos123 & DIYOR_8282
4W 1L
80%
Akro & BuNGuN.481 & ZerO0918
3W 2L
60%
59 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1100
  • Team average: 1001 against 975.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1091
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:48·2026-10-03 11:22 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Opponent rating: 1015.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 991
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:01:20·2026-09-05 16:55 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1092
  • Team average: 1064 against 1010.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1082
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:02·2026-09-05 16:10 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1092
  • Team average: 1040 against 1130.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1088
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:54·2026-08-29 10:50 UTC
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1095
  • Team average: 1099 against 1052.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1085
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:39·2026-08-29 09:56 UTC
LBFME1Dunharrow IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Opponent rating: 972.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 999
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:02:52·2026-08-29 08:57 UTC
LBFME1FFA Druadan Forest 2.22How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Free for all, rated against 1010. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 997
Gondor·FFA·00:46:13·2026-08-27 16:24 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1077
  • Team average: 1019 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1070
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:28:23·2026-08-27 12:57 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1086
  • Team average: 1031 against 1010.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1077
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:25·2026-08-27 12:41 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1087
  • Team average: 1025 against 987.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1077
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:37·2026-08-27 12:08 UTC