← Home

Username

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,740 / 2,000 XP
260 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
976
ELO
#804
0W 3L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
847
ELO
#1746
0W 26L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NZT-
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
NZT-
0W 1L
0%
Mariio
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
NZT- & Username
0W 1L
0%
Mariio & Username
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
dragonez & Kyagara
0W 2L
0%
HaroonZ & Sera12345
0W 1L
0%
2 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 848
  • Opponent rating: 1111.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 847
Men·1 versus 1·00:09:59·2026-10-23 16:03 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 849
  • Opponent rating: 1120.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 848
Men·1 versus 1·00:08:42·2026-10-23 15:50 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 850
  • Opponent rating: 1138.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 849
Men·1 versus 1·00:07:54·2026-10-23 15:36 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 852
  • Opponent rating: 984.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 850
Men·1 versus 1·00:18:14·2026-10-23 15:02 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 853
  • Opponent rating: 1055.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 852
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:28·2026-10-23 14:49 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 863
  • Opponent rating: 815.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 853
Men·1 versus 1·00:23:35·2026-10-23 14:10 UTC
LRotWKForest of HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 873
  • Opponent rating: 836.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 863
Men·1 versus 1·00:21:58·2026-10-23 13:43 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 883
  • Opponent rating: 826.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 873
Men·1 versus 1·00:30:08·2026-10-23 13:11 UTC
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 893
  • Opponent rating: 816.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 883
Men·1 versus 1·00:19:38·2026-10-23 12:49 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 900
  • Opponent rating: 944.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 893
Men·1 versus 1·00:22:22·2026-10-23 12:24 UTC