← Home

Vichking

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 37,000 / 10,000 XP
3,000 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
1015
ELO
#64
2W 0L · 100%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1014
ELO
#183
8W 6L · 57%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
994
ELO
#272
0W 2L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
990
ELO
#722
1W 2L · 33%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
961
ELO
#792
0W 5L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#483
#483
Season 1
991 pts
0W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
FFA · BFME1
BEST
#109
#109
Season 1
997 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
abbos123
6W 1L, 86% over 7 games
abbos123
6W 1L
86%
The last Ronin
5W 1L
83%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
abbos123 & The last Ronin & Vichking
4W 1L
80%
skar amaki & Vichking
2W 3L
40%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Glaurungg & KingZiggy & Lord Ziggy
1W 3L
25%
N3viA & nasafa & TwoConcept7077
1W 1L
50%
62 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Team average: 1009 against 978.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1015
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:35:21·2026-10-18 15:33 UTC
WBFME1Lamedon IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1001 against 986.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1008
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:12:25·2026-10-18 15:16 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1023
  • Team average: 1050 against 1052.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1014
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:24:13·2026-09-09 17:22 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1027
  • Team average: 1004 against 1098.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1023
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:40:39·2026-09-03 18:01 UTC
LBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Team average: 988 against 1094.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1027
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:07:35·2026-09-03 17:52 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1020
  • Team average: 999 against 1105.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 1031
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:29:22·2026-09-03 17:20 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1023
  • Team average: 989 against 1102.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 1020
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:19·2026-09-03 17:05 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Team average: 988 against 969.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1023
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:01:06·2026-09-03 17:00 UTC
LBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 968
  • Team average: 960 against 994.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 961
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:17:32·2026-09-01 18:22 UTC
LBFME1HarlondHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 977
  • Team average: 984 against 990.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 968
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:20:50·2026-09-01 17:58 UTC