← Home

White wizard

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 39,760 / 10,000 XP
240 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Rohan
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
982
ELO
#152
0W 2L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#323
#323
Season 1
1,002 pts
2W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#207
#207
Season 2
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-11-01
#521
Season 1
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#434
#867
Season 2
956 pts
2W / 6L
2026-11-01
#434
Season 1
991 pts
3W / 4L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
abbos123
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Lord Ziggy
1W 4L
20%
Pimbyn
0W 4L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
AkselPowah & White wizard
0W 3L
0%
Blocky & White wizard
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Aragornbek & beko
1W 1L
50%
MAGAA & Tiger6
0W 2L
0%
67 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 1007 against 1006.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 982
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:26·2026-11-04 22:29 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 992 against 990.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:24:17·2026-11-04 20:57 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 953
  • Team average: 1101 against 984.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 956
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:01·2026-09-05 15:19 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 962
  • Team average: 1008 against 996.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 953
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:24:14·2026-08-30 19:29 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 1014 against 988.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 962
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:57·2026-08-30 19:13 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 979
  • Team average: 975 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 971
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:33:03·2026-08-30 18:37 UTC
WBFME1EastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1001 against 1017.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:31:47·2026-08-30 16:10 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Team average: 984 against 925.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 979
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:02·2026-08-30 15:56 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 1045 against 987.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 989
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:50·2026-08-29 17:06 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1047 against 982.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 999
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:10·2026-08-29 16:47 UTC