← Home

ZoranSRB17

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 35,280 / 10,000 XP
4,720 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#356
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
989
ELO
#716
4W 6L · 40%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#251
#251
Season 1
1,000 pts
28W / 27L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Valfran_
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Gurte
1W 1L
50%
Valfran_
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Gurte & ZoranSRB17
1W 1L
50%
Valfran_ & ZoranSRB17
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
JorlDain & TheKing
1W 1L
50%
Allyxman1 & Gurte
1W 0L
100%
21 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:20·2026-04-27 15:30 UTC
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:22:09·2026-04-04 12:56 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:17:55·2026-04-03 14:09 UTC
LRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 998
  • Team average: 1019 against 1027.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 989
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:43:00·2026-03-31 21:20 UTC
LRotWKUpper LebenninHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1026 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 998
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:09:43·2026-03-31 21:08 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:07:08·2026-03-30 22:22 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:33:47·2026-03-30 12:58 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:15:54·2026-03-28 16:57 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:36:35·2026-03-25 16:57 UTC
LRotWKOst-in-EdhilHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Team average: 1006 against 1071.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:47·2026-03-23 18:28 UTC