← Home

[BR]anywew

[BR] Barad-dûr · Member
📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 417,610 / 20,000 XP
2,390 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Lothlorien
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Gondor
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Show all 10
Arnor
RotWK
Imladris
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Rohan
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKEnnorath · 1 versus 1
1051
ELO
#48
83W 65L · 56%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#324
3W 3L · 50%
RotWKEnnorath · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#43
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKEnnorath · 3 versus 3
983
ELO
#43
1W 3L · 25%
RotWKEnnorath · FFA
922
ELO
#39
3W 12L · 20%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Gravet
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Nikolaaas
2W 2L
50%
Cypher
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
anywew & frodo1994 & Nikolaaas
0W 2L
0%
anywew & Gravet & Nikolaaas
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Gravet & Samkov & Snake-Eyes
0W 2L
0%
Amelie & Cypher & Konev
1W 0L
100%
9 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Have 25 friends.
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKHollin IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1074
  • Opponent rating: 1021.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1064
Lothlorien·1 versus 1·00:18:22·2026-10-02 14:37 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1084
  • Opponent rating: 1144.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1078
Lothlorien·1 versus 1·00:20:38·2026-09-27 17:35 UTC
LRotWKFords of Isen (Unlame)How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1091
  • Opponent rating: 1137.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1084
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:27·2026-09-27 17:13 UTC
LRotWKUdun IIIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lothlorien·3 versus 3·00:16:55·2026-09-25 14:37 UTC
LRotWKEryn Rhun IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:19:40·2026-09-25 14:01 UTC
LRotWKWestfold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1093
  • Opponent rating: 1107.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1085
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:05:49·2026-09-23 15:10 UTC
LRotWKWestfold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1086
  • Opponent rating: 1195.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 1083
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:12:02·2026-09-23 00:16 UTC
LRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Opponent rating: 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:34:42·2026-09-22 23:09 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1068
  • Opponent rating: 1128.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1062
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:04:47·2026-09-22 17:44 UTC
LRotWKHollin IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1075
  • Opponent rating: 1121.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1068
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:05:25·2026-09-22 17:32 UTC