← HomeLEVEL
Level 39,120 / 10,000 XP
880 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1W 2L · 33%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
22W 62L · 26%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#1265
Season 1
871 pts
9W / 30L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Empyy
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
attitude & Empyy
1W 0L
100%
attitude & RuizRacer1
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Mahorelas & ZEN1990
1W 0L
100%
Felipemito & Makaa
0W 1L
0%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Called to the Lists
Level 1 of 2
1.7% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.7% of players

LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- Rating before: 796
- Opponent rating: 851.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 790
Men·1 versus 1·00:46:17·2026-08-22 19:57 UTC
LRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 803
- Opponent rating: 847.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 796
Men·1 versus 1·00:41:57·2026-07-13 18:32 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 810
- Opponent rating: 855.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 803
Men·1 versus 1·00:45:32·2026-07-12 12:26 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 815
- Opponent rating: 886.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 810
Men·1 versus 1·00:30:47·2026-07-11 11:43 UTC
LRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 825
- Opponent rating: 774.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 815
Men·1 versus 1·00:13:59·2026-06-20 22:20 UTC
WRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out- Rating before: 816
- Opponent rating: 831.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 825
Men·1 versus 1·00:48:04·2026-06-18 18:47 UTC
WRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out- Rating before: 806
- Opponent rating: 858.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 816
Men·1 versus 1·00:37:26·2026-06-17 22:21 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 813
- Opponent rating: 852.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 806
Men·1 versus 1·00:03:59·2026-06-13 17:27 UTC
LRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out- Rating before: 820
- Opponent rating: 866.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 813
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:59·2026-06-13 12:29 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 825
- Opponent rating: 900.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 820
Men·1 versus 1·00:15:54·2026-06-12 21:03 UTC