← HomeLEVEL
Level 416,760 / 20,000 XP
3,240 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 7
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1W 6L · 14%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#1141
Season 1
953 pts
1W / 9L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Magosh
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Banned Smurf of Orcy & braveheart & konkwi31 & Magosh
0W 1L
0%
.B.R. & braveheart
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Choy & Excelsior & Morgomirh & Poero
0W 1L
0%
2 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Host of the West
Level 2 of 2
1.1% of players
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- Rating before: 960
- Opponent rating: 918.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 967
Angmar·1 versus 1·02:33:38·2026-06-08 04:26 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out- Rating before: 966
- Opponent rating: 1030.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 960
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:12:19·2026-06-05 19:04 UTC 
LRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out- Rating before: 970
- Opponent rating: 1059.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 966
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:12:42·2026-06-05 18:47 UTC 
LRotWKNorth MirkwoodHow this was worked out- Rating before: 976
- Opponent rating: 1026.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 970
Men·1 versus 1·00:15:33·2026-06-03 01:27 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 983
- Opponent rating: 1019.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 976
Men·1 versus 1·00:09:41·2026-06-03 01:14 UTC 
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 993
- Opponent rating: 929.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 983
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:47·2026-06-03 01:05 UTC 
LRotWKRiver NimrodelHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Opponent rating: 1043.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 993
Men·1 versus 1·00:05:08·2026-06-03 00:48 UTC 
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:02:02·2026-01-21 18:38 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:01:30·2026-01-21 18:34 UTC
WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:08·2026-01-21 18:23 UTC
