← Home

bumbo

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 24,910 / 5,000 XP
90 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1023
ELO
#209
19W 12L · 61%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1009
ELO
#56
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
991
ELO
#598
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#424
#424
Season 1
996 pts
6W / 5L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TheKing
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
TheKing
1W 0L
100%
MSKU
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
bumbo & MSKU & TheKing
1W 0L
100%
Ahiles & bumbo
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Masho & Mr_ken & Pshebi
1W 0L
100%
Rimo6 & Sarmat
0W 1L
0%
1 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1052
  • Opponent rating: 1114.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1046
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:52·2026-09-24 14:11 UTC
vs UnRo
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1039
  • Opponent rating: 1104.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 1033
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:04·2026-09-08 14:19 UTC
vs beko
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Opponent rating: 1079.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1024
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:59·2026-09-04 19:17 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 952.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:28·2026-08-11 17:06 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1006
  • Opponent rating: 1085.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1001
Elves·1 versus 1·00:08:50·2026-07-23 14:45 UTC
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Opponent rating: 1063.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 997
Elves·1 versus 1·00:18:09·2026-06-19 14:48 UTC
LRotWKEphel DuathHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Opponent rating: 1086.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1003
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:07:39·2026-06-19 14:39 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1005
  • Opponent rating: 1038.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 998
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:06:59·2026-06-09 12:03 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Opponent rating: 1044.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 986
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:23:11·2026-06-02 15:07 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 997
  • Opponent rating: 1082.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 992
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:05:07·2026-06-02 14:54 UTC
vs Khal