← Home

cicus84

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 23,060 / 5,000 XP
1,940 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Goblins
RotWKMAIN
Dwarves
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Show all 7
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
992
ELO
#505
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
944
ELO
#1640
0W 8L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Cong
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Cong
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
cicus84 & Cong
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Harko & LoroParque
0W 1L
0%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKFirien WoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1023.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:12:20·2026-10-29 18:59 UTC
LRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 951
  • Opponent rating: 992.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 944
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:14:28·2026-10-24 15:26 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 961
  • Opponent rating: 911.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 951
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:11:31·2026-10-24 11:23 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 970
  • Opponent rating: 961.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 961
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:12:09·2026-10-24 11:08 UTC
vs vfrc
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 975
  • Opponent rating: 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 970
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:18:03·2026-10-15 13:52 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 982
  • Opponent rating: 1031.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 975
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:08:12·2026-10-15 13:42 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 830.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -12.
  • Rating after: 982
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:19:29·2026-09-05 12:48 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Opponent rating: 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 994
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:04:08·2026-09-05 12:11 UTC
LRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1185.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 999
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:13:58·2026-09-05 11:49 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:07:58·2025-10-25 16:53 UTC