← Home

dani187

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 412,480 / 20,000 XP
7,520 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Elves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#224
2W 1L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#155
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
869
ELO
#1845
28W 66L · 30%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1243
#1243
Season 1
903 pts
16W / 49L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Schere
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Schere
1W 0L
100%
BananenBro
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
dani187 & Schere
1W 0L
100%
BananenBro & dani187
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Benken & GESLARD
1W 0L
100%
Aubergine & numinorian
1W 0L
100%
7 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 881
  • Opponent rating: 649.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -12.
  • Rating after: 869
Men·1 versus 1·00:19:45·2026-10-12 22:41 UTC
LRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 863
  • Opponent rating: 1023.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 862
Men·1 versus 1·00:38:38·2026-10-12 20:37 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 845
  • Opponent rating: 1142.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 844
Men·1 versus 1·00:08:55·2026-10-10 21:47 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 855
  • Opponent rating: 821.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 845
Men·1 versus 1·00:30:55·2026-10-10 21:14 UTC
LRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 848
  • Opponent rating: 1023.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 847
Men·1 versus 1·00:06:25·2026-10-10 20:43 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 849
  • Opponent rating: 1022.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 848
Men·1 versus 1·00:22:26·2026-10-10 20:18 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 850
  • Opponent rating: 1132.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 849
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:08·2026-10-10 19:53 UTC
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 846
  • Opponent rating: 903.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 840
Men·1 versus 1·00:18:26·2026-10-06 11:08 UTC
LRotWKArchetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 854
  • Opponent rating: 864.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 846
Men·1 versus 1·00:27:25·2026-10-06 10:37 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 861
  • Opponent rating: 903.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 854
Men·1 versus 1·00:39:31·2026-10-06 08:34 UTC