← HomeLEVEL
Level 520,290 / 40,000 XP
19,710 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
18W 15L · 55%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
5W 7L · 42%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1W 5L · 17%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
#99
Season 1
1,062 pts
65W / 54L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
#70
Season 1
1,070 pts
23W / 16L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
#78
Season 1
1,047 pts
9W / 4L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
#42
Season 1
1,017 pts
2W / 0L
2026-08-01
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NeYo
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
dinc3rg & Free-Willy
2W 1L
67%
cache1010 & dinc3rg
1W 2L
33%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Aranruth & El3nallar
1W 1L
50%
66 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Many Tongues
1.6% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.1% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 987
- Team average: 1005 against 973.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 977
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:24:37·2026-10-16 16:06 UTC
WBFME1Dorwinion IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 945 against 967.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 991
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:22:56·2026-09-26 19:41 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1001 against 1095.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 987
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:00·2026-09-26 15:03 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1030
- Opponent rating: 1079.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1023
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:17:48·2026-09-25 14:38 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1037
- Opponent rating: 1072.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1030
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:12:59·2026-09-25 14:23 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1043
- Opponent rating: 1111.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1037
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:30:47·2026-09-25 08:49 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 997 against 1133.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 991
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:10·2026-09-24 21:54 UTC
LBFME1Osgiliath IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 1009 against 1109.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 982
Rohan·2 versus 2·00:15:35·2026-09-24 21:31 UTC
LBFME1Far Harad 2.22How this was worked out- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 992 against 1096.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 986
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:29:13·2026-09-24 20:55 UTC
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1033
- Opponent rating: 1067.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1043
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:11:27·2026-09-21 16:04 UTC