← Home

f0rnost

ADMIN
📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,560 / 2,000 XP
440 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Elves
BFME1
Wild
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Legends of the 3rd Age · 2 versus 2
1044
ELO
#1
9W 3L · 75%
BFME1Legends of the 3rd Age · 3 versus 3
1008
ELO
#7
3W 2L · 60%
BFME1Legends of the 3rd Age · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#12
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

No finished seasons on this patch yet.

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Arnor
153W 23L, 87% over 176 games
Arnor
153W 23L
87%
Bali
8W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Arnor & f0rnost
18W 2L
90%
Arnor & Bali & f0rnost
8W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
A L S y A f & Argonn
4W 0L
100%
RedBracket & Vitamin_
3W 1L
75%
60 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 20 games in a row. The Beacons Are Lit · 31 Aug 2026 Flame of Anor · 4 Oct 2026
Flame of Anor
Level 2 of 3
1.6% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1247
  • Team average: 1207 against 1016.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1248
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:23·2026-10-16 18:15 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1244
  • Team average: 1164 against 1050.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1247
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:35·2026-10-15 16:14 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1243
  • Team average: 1260 against 1106.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1244
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:59·2026-10-15 16:01 UTC
WBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1239
  • Team average: 1159 against 1058.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1243
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:08·2026-10-15 15:46 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1252
  • Team average: 1220 against 955.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -13.
  • Rating after: 1239
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:01·2026-10-15 15:26 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1251
  • Team average: 1271 against 998.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1252
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:57·2026-10-15 15:08 UTC
WBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1246
  • Team average: 1136 against 1065.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1251
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:27:47·2026-10-15 14:27 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1245
  • Team average: 1208 against 917.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1246
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:06·2026-10-15 14:06 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1242
  • Team average: 1208 against 1086.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1245
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:09·2026-10-14 16:24 UTC
WBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1037
  • Team average: 1155 against 1016.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1039
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:12:16·2026-10-14 15:48 UTC