← Home

giga_chad

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 521,370 / 40,000 XP
18,630 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Rohan
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Elves
BFME2

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
962
ELO
#836
0W 7L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#194
#194
Season 1
1,008 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
CamelRider
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
jshephard
7W 10L
41%
beko
4W 6L
40%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
giga_chad & jshephard
2W 1L
67%
beko & Elendilbek & giga_chad
2W 1L
67%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
NoLdoR_ & Skovorodka
0W 2L
0%
HALBRAND9 & Keso
0W 2L
0%
64 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Team average: 959 against 1140.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 962
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:08·2026-10-10 11:31 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 968
  • Team average: 1108 against 1178.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 963
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:05:20·2026-10-09 11:00 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 970
  • Team average: 1018 against 1155.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 968
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:13·2026-10-08 19:16 UTC
LBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Team average: 1030 against 979.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 970
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:05:02·2026-09-23 17:04 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Team average: 1038 against 1207.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 980
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:04·2026-09-22 18:53 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 990
  • Team average: 1000 against 980.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 981
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:27:51·2026-09-22 17:34 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1048 against 1006.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:16·2026-09-20 15:51 UTC
LBFME1FFA Druadan Forest 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·Free for all (4p)·00:39:44·2026-04-11 09:57 UTC
LBFME1FFA Wold 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·Free for all (4p)·00:20:20·2026-04-11 09:29 UTC
LBFME1FFA HarlondHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·Free for all (4p)·00:20:50·2026-04-11 09:04 UTC