← Home

iDaazl

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,670 / 5,000 XP
2,330 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Elves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1042
ELO
#182
8W 2L · 80%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#172
2W 1L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
982
ELO
#159
0W 2L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#399
#399
Season 1
997 pts
7W / 7L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
RTOZZZZZZZ
2W 1L, 67% over 3 games
RTOZZZZZZZ
2W 1L
67%
Sody 1 09
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
iDaazl & RTOZZZZZZZ
2W 1L
67%
Dregal & iDaazl & MalodiuS & Sody 1 09
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Aear & krabovoz
1W 0L
100%
Baikal & JorlDain
1W 0L
100%
8 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Have 25 friends.
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 1132.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 992
Men·1 versus 1·00:11:44·2026-10-24 15:12 UTC
LRotWKPelennor Fields OutskirtsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 1013 against 1003.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 982
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:17:11·2026-09-02 19:41 UTC
LRotWKDesert of RhunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1008 against 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Elves·4 versus 4·00:08:54·2026-09-02 19:30 UTC
LRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1016 against 984.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
Men·2 versus 2·00:12:15·2026-07-17 19:03 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1067.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Men·1 versus 1·00:14:46·2026-07-17 18:42 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:03:20·2026-02-12 21:20 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:14:16·2026-02-12 20:58 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:15:49·2026-02-12 20:22 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:15:20·2026-02-06 10:50 UTC
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:17:24·2026-02-05 20:13 UTC