← Home

kolya0100

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 413,960 / 20,000 XP
6,040 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
1000
ELO
#75
1W 1L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
979
ELO
#918
3W 6L · 33%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
972
ELO
#774
64W 72L · 47%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
951
ELO
#845
14W 21L · 40%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
938
ELO
#451
0W 7L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#795
#795
Season 1
982 pts
0W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#355
#355
Season 1
994 pts
1W / 2L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
MAGAA
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
sherxan
18W 18L
50%
baxa0309
10W 18L
36%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
kolya0100 & mashhurbek & sherxan
2W 5L
29%
Aragornn & kolya0100
2W 3L
40%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
greyhound & M_D_M. & wanderking
3W 3L
50%
Glaurungg & King_Elessar
2W 0L
100%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 961
  • Team average: 927 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 972
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:11·2026-10-10 12:38 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 1057 against 924.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 961
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:53·2026-10-10 12:22 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 949
  • Team average: 922 against 965.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 959
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:15·2026-09-05 19:41 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 957
  • Team average: 930 against 957.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 949
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:10·2026-09-05 19:26 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 938 against 949.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 957
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:56·2026-09-05 19:09 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Team average: 947 against 940.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:56·2026-09-05 18:45 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 938 against 949.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 974
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:48·2026-09-05 18:20 UTC
LBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Team average: 942 against 1042.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:35·2026-09-05 18:09 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 973
  • Team average: 946 against 1038.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 969
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:06·2026-09-05 17:53 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 979
  • Team average: 962 against 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 973
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:13·2026-08-28 20:20 UTC