← Home

kolya0100

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 413,960 / 20,000 XP
6,040 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#795
#953
Season 2
979 pts
3W / 6L
2026-11-01
#795
Season 1
982 pts
0W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#876
#876
Season 2
951 pts
14W / 21L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#355
#792
Season 2
972 pts
64W / 72L
2026-11-01
#355
Season 1
994 pts
1W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#465
#465
Season 2
938 pts
0W / 7L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
FFA · BFME1
BEST
#77
#77
Season 2
1,000 pts
1W / 1L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
MAGAA
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
sherxan
18W 18L
50%
baxa0309
10W 18L
36%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
kolya0100 & mashhurbek & sherxan
2W 5L
29%
Aragornn & kolya0100
2W 3L
40%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
greyhound & M_D_M. & wanderking
3W 3L
50%
Glaurungg & King_Elessar
2W 0L
100%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.7% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 961
  • Team average: 927 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 972
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:11·2026-10-10 12:38 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 1057 against 924.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 961
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:53·2026-10-10 12:22 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 949
  • Team average: 922 against 965.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 959
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:15·2026-09-05 19:41 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 957
  • Team average: 930 against 957.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 949
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:10·2026-09-05 19:26 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 938 against 949.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 957
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:56·2026-09-05 19:09 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Team average: 947 against 940.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:56·2026-09-05 18:45 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 938 against 949.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 974
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:48·2026-09-05 18:20 UTC
LBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Team average: 942 against 1042.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 965
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:35·2026-09-05 18:09 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 973
  • Team average: 946 against 1038.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 969
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:06·2026-09-05 17:53 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 979
  • Team average: 962 against 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 973
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:13·2026-08-28 20:20 UTC