← HomeLEVEL
Level 657,300 / 80,000 XP
22,700 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
10W 7L · 59%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
16W 17L · 48%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
0W 3L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
2W 6L · 25%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
#375
Season 1
998 pts
40W / 60L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
#601
Season 1
986 pts
34W / 46L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
#642
Season 1
952 pts
6W / 16L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
#81
Season 1
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01
#63
Season 1
999 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Vitamin_
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Brass Meerkat & nasafa
4W 3L
57%
nasafa & Rep_Tile
3W 1L
75%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
TwoConcept7077 & XaYaBi
2W 0L
100%
DOVUD & Tom_Bombadil_
1W 1L
50%
68 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Many Tongues
1.6% of players
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1041
- Team average: 998 against 1100.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1037
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:34·2026-10-25 12:01 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1050
- Team average: 1088 against 1063.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1041
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:48·2026-10-25 11:42 UTC 
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1012
- Opponent rating: 1115.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1008
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:27:44·2026-10-24 13:47 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1056
- Team average: 960 against 1017.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1050
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:52·2026-10-24 13:39 UTC 
LBFME1Rohan IIHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1019
- Opponent rating: 1067.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1012
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:11:44·2026-10-24 09:09 UTC
LBFME1FFA MirkwoodHow this was worked out- Rating before: 993
- Free for all, rated against 1000. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 990
Rohan·FFA·00:47:39·2026-10-24 08:39 UTCLBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1026
- Opponent rating: 1062.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1019
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:23:44·2026-10-23 11:24 UTC 
LBFME1FFA BucklandHow this was worked out- Rating before: 997
- Free for all, rated against 934. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 993
Isengard·FFA·00:24:03·2026-10-23 08:19 UTC 
LBFME1Harondor NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1051
- Team average: 952 against 992.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1044
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:56·2026-10-22 14:51 UTC 
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1025
- Opponent rating: 1076.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1019
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:11:36·2026-10-02 15:59 UTC