← Home

nazgule

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 412,530 / 20,000 XP
7,470 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Angmar
RotWKMAIN
Goblins
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#266
3W 1L · 75%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#507
74W 81L · 48%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
998
ELO
#54
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Solenar
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Solenar
2W 0L
100%
Likantrop
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
nazgule & Solenar
2W 0L
100%
Likantrop & nazgule
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Eiklan & legodelas
2W 0L
100%
CumEatRO & werdzil
1W 0L
100%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Opponent rating: 978.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1000
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:20:39·2026-11-01 12:59 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Opponent rating: 993.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 992
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:08:07·2026-10-30 15:33 UTC
WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Opponent rating: 1080.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1001
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:59·2026-10-30 10:14 UTC
WRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Opponent rating: 925.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 991
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:22:46·2026-10-26 20:14 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Opponent rating: 1094.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 985
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:16:01·2026-10-26 19:52 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 1074.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 989
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:13:30·2026-10-25 16:39 UTC
LRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1068.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:06:41·2026-10-25 16:31 UTC
WRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Opponent rating: 1084.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1017
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:30:29·2026-09-15 19:19 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Opponent rating: 1230.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:39·2026-09-15 19:00 UTC
WRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1005
  • Opponent rating: 882.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1008
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:10:19·2026-09-10 22:14 UTC