← Home

numinorian

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 410,590 / 20,000 XP
9,410 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Show all 7
Goblins
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#478
36W 48L · 43%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
995
ELO
#358
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1083
#1083
Season 1
964 pts
9W / 17L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Aubergine
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Aubergine
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Aubergine & numinorian
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
BananenBro & dani187
0W 1L
0%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 939.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1000
Men·1 versus 1·00:23:48·2026-10-11 19:55 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 994
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:17:51·2026-10-11 19:35 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1012
  • Opponent rating: 1015.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1003
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:18:08·2026-10-11 19:15 UTC
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Opponent rating: 932.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1012
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:00:38·2026-10-11 19:09 UTC
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Opponent rating: 938.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1007
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:00:34·2026-10-11 19:05 UTC
WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 945.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1001
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:00:21·2026-10-11 19:03 UTC
WRotWKDunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 990
  • Opponent rating: 886.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 994
Elves·1 versus 1·00:34:58·2026-10-07 09:46 UTC
WRotWKArchetHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 984
  • Opponent rating: 924.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 990
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:12·2026-10-06 04:21 UTC
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 977
  • Opponent rating: 931.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 984
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:40·2026-10-06 04:03 UTC
WRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 970
  • Opponent rating: 935.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 977
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:19:36·2026-10-06 03:34 UTC