← Home

pawked

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 412,610 / 20,000 XP
7,390 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Angmar
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Show all 7
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
1009
ELO
#20
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
992
ELO
#532
8W 8L · 50%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1210
#1210
Season 1
927 pts
34W / 64L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Belisarius
2W 1L, 67% over 3 games
Belisarius
2W 1L
67%
likenet
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Belisarius & pawked
2W 1L
67%
likenet & pawked
1W 1L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Baikal & JorlDain
2W 0L
100%
Carcosa & likenet
1W 1L
50%
30 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:25:43·2026-04-08 22:17 UTC
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:06:28·2026-04-08 22:00 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:28:56·2026-04-02 18:49 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:33:15·2026-04-01 23:22 UTC
WRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:47:11·2026-04-01 20:57 UTC
WRotWKAnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 983
  • Team average: 996 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 992
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:34:13·2026-03-31 18:57 UTC
WRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Team average: 982 against 985.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 983
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:06:54·2026-03-31 17:46 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:06:21·2026-03-31 17:08 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:10:52·2026-03-30 22:51 UTC
LRotWKLast BridgeHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:18:30·2026-03-30 20:37 UTC