← HomeLEVEL
Level 654,290 / 80,000 XP
25,710 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 9
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
30W 18L · 62%
BFME2Patch 1.06v4 · 1 versus 1
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
3W 6L · 33%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#79
Season 1
1,078 pts
83W / 69L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Xewix
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Hunter... & piterpayn
6W 2L
75%
FatmanFred & piterpayn
3W 2L
60%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
BananenBro & VolkorBro
5W 2L
71%
Sebubu & Wrogashz
3W 1L
75%
61 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Loremaster
only 116 players
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 152 players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players
WRotWKEred LithuiHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1086
- Team average: 1025 against 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1094
Men2 versus 200:11:312026-02-09 17:59 UTC
WRotWKWestfarthingHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:21:062026-02-09 16:24 UTC
WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor1 versus 100:18:042026-02-09 01:02 UTC
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:09:062026-02-09 00:03 UTC
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:05:212026-02-08 23:56 UTC 
LRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:14:572026-02-07 02:55 UTC LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor1 versus 100:14:322026-02-07 02:08 UTC WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:09:502026-02-07 01:57 UTC 
LRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:16:212026-02-07 01:38 UTC WRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:16:042026-02-07 01:20 UTC
