← Home

rodrigol

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,460 / 2,000 XP
540 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#642
#642
Season 2
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#631
#631
Season 2
988 pts
0W / 2L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#175
#175
Season 2
1,017 pts
3W / 0L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#306
#306
Season 2
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Aragornn
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Aragornn
2W 0L
100%
XANZO050
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Didar & rodrigol & XANZO050
1W 0L
100%
Aragornn & NeYo & rodrigol
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
1010 & BlackWarden & Qwerwwewqq
2W 0L
100%
Clifdoe & sherxan & Yanis
1W 0L
100%
19 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Tributs of HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 978.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:03:09·2026-09-02 18:19 UTC
LBFME1Gap of Rohan IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 996
  • Team average: 992 against 1019.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 988
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:23:49·2026-08-31 18:38 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Team average: 988 against 983.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1017
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:56·2026-08-31 14:58 UTC
LBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 988 against 1079.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 996
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:04·2026-08-31 14:39 UTC
LBFME1Pelennor Fields NmHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1005 against 982.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:25:17·2026-08-31 10:56 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Team average: 1079 against 1007.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1008
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:35·2026-08-31 10:39 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1117 against 1010.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1003
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:54·2026-08-31 10:26 UTC
WBFME1Brandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:33:08·2025-09-13 21:27 UTC
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:19:30·2025-09-13 20:59 UTC
WBFME1Dunharrow IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:19·2025-09-13 18:46 UTC