← HomeLEVEL
Level 411,280 / 20,000 XP
8,720 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 11
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1W 4L · 20%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
9W 21L · 30%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Ennorath
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#389
Season 1
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-10-28
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#1291
Season 1
808 pts
13W / 76L
2026-05-15
Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
#544
Season 2
992 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01
#503
Season 1
992 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
#647
Season 2
987 pts
0W / 2L
2026-11-01
#105
Season 2
999 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
ESCOBAR7
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
ESCOBAR7 & Jackasss & savanarola
1W 0L
100%
FoxSer & Piccolini & savanarola
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Biricix & NAZAR013 & Salussa
1W 0L
100%
batouille & IvanaHave6 & JorlDain
1W 0L
100%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 938
- Opponent rating: 1132.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 937
Elves·1 versus 1·00:07:32·2026-09-23 03:12 UTC
WRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 926
- Opponent rating: 1144.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +12.
- Rating after: 938
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:01:16·2026-09-23 03:09 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 916
- Opponent rating: 954.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 926
Isengard·1 versus 1·01:08:32·2026-09-10 21:30 UTC 
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 1060 against 1076.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 987
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:56·2026-08-27 20:08 UTC 
LBFME1FFA MirkwoodHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Free for all, rated against 1250. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 999
Isengard·FFA·00:22:52·2026-08-27 19:44 UTC 
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out- Rating before: 923
- Opponent rating: 970.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 916
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:16·2026-08-27 19:26 UTC WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 912
- Opponent rating: 1000.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 923
Elves·1 versus 1·00:05:06·2026-08-27 19:18 UTC 
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out- Rating before: 919
- Opponent rating: 961.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 912
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:23:50·2026-08-26 17:16 UTC
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out- Rating before: 918
- Opponent rating: 778.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 919
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:12:57·2026-08-26 16:10 UTC 
LRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out- Rating before: 919
- Opponent rating: 1088.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 918
Men·1 versus 1·00:09:49·2026-08-24 21:11 UTC
