← HomeLEVEL
Level 39,580 / 10,000 XP
420 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 10
Ladders
RotWKEdain Unchained · 4 versus 4
1W 2L · 33%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 3 versus 3
1W 7L · 12%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 2 versus 2
3W 9L · 25%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 1 versus 1
4W 75L · 5%
LAST 5 SEASONS
No finished seasons on this patch yet.
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Dregal
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
AlphaLurch & selecuid
2W 2L
50%
Dregal & selecuid
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
CobraKai & CROAT & Pablo.420
0W 3L
0%
konkwi31 & ossogart
0W 3L
0%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
The Wide World
only 44 players
LRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3·00:34:34·2026-09-27 21:21 UTCWRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lothlorien·3 versus 3·00:46:16·2026-09-27 20:30 UTC
WRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·2 versus 2·00:40:05·2026-09-27 19:40 UTC 
LRotWKLithladHow this was worked out- Rating before: 795
- Opponent rating: 984.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 794
Lothlorien·1 versus 1·00:24:14·2026-09-27 10:35 UTC 
LRotWKNaith LķriensHow this was worked out- Rating before: 796
- Opponent rating: 1142.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 795
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:26:06·2026-09-27 10:07 UTC
LRotWKAlte FurtHow this was worked out- Rating before: 797
- Opponent rating: 1141.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 796
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:12:18·2026-09-27 09:53 UTC 
LRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out- Rating before: 840
- Opponent rating: 936.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 836
Arnor·1 versus 1·00:16:06·2026-09-27 09:32 UTC
LRotWKFords of Isen (Unlame)How this was worked out- Rating before: 841
- Opponent rating: 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 840
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:19:42·2026-09-27 09:11 UTCLRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3·00:25:55·2026-09-26 21:12 UTC 
LRotWKDer Fluss AdornHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·4 versus 4·00:29:48·2026-09-26 20:30 UTC
