← Home

werewolf

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 411,580 / 20,000 XP
8,420 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Dwarves
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Show all 7
Mordor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
996
ELO
#360
10W 12L · 45%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#140
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
973
ELO
#182
3W 6L · 33%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#200
#200
Season 1
1,000 pts
20W / 13L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Blasttoise
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Matty
5W 5L
50%
TheKing
2W 3L
40%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
TheKing & werewolf
2W 3L
40%
Matty & werewolf
2W 2L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
adivassi & Gogeta & konkwi31 & Matty
0W 3L
0%
Brav & likenet
1W 1L
50%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.7% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:06:16·2026-04-17 11:05 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:06:40·2026-04-09 08:04 UTC
LRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Team average: 989 against 1020.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 971
Elves·2 versus 2·00:10:56·2026-04-04 18:40 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:44·2026-04-01 19:24 UTC
LRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:09:35·2026-04-01 19:05 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:07:45·2026-04-01 14:34 UTC
LRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Team average: 1073 against 1122.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 978
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:38:51·2026-03-17 14:13 UTC
LRotWKEred LithuiHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Team average: 1078 against 1118.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 985
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:05:30·2026-03-17 14:06 UTC
LRotWKOst-in-EdhilHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1086 against 1110.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Men·2 versus 2·00:20:46·2026-03-17 13:41 UTC
LRotWKAnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1005
  • Team average: 1002 against 1078.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1000
Elves·2 versus 2·00:15:48·2026-03-16 18:20 UTC