← Home

zerk

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 23,440 / 5,000 XP
1,560 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Angmar
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
998
ELO
#53
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
986
ELO
#704
0W 2L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
974
ELO
#168
2W 5L · 29%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
967
ELO
#1441
7W 15L · 32%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Poero
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Poero
2W 0L
100%
Excelsior
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Dregal & Eternity & Excelsior & zerk
1W 0L
100%
Gurte & Hosamkh & Poero & zerk
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
DrThrax & Elessar100 & french tax & Sody 1 09
1W 0L
100%
Mansaw & Masho & Matty & UnRo
1W 0L
100%
32 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKNanduhirionHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:31:26·2026-10-10 22:05 UTC
LRotWKUmbar PeninsulaHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:21:14·2026-10-10 21:42 UTC
LRotWKLanthir LamathHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·4 versus 4·00:18:15·2026-10-10 21:17 UTC
LRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Opponent rating: 1046.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 967
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:20:01·2026-10-10 01:43 UTC
LRotWKFurnaces of Mount DoomHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·FFA·01:17:49·2026-10-04 21:47 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Opponent rating: 1044.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 972
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:13:35·2026-10-03 23:35 UTC
LRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 988
  • Opponent rating: 957.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 978
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:26·2026-10-03 15:51 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 983
  • Opponent rating: 901.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 988
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:13:54·2026-09-28 01:17 UTC
vs Pies
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 984
  • Opponent rating: 1285.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 983
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:05:24·2026-09-28 01:11 UTC
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 983
  • Opponent rating: 784.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 984
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:18:53·2026-09-20 23:08 UTC