Founded 2026-11-08 · by KingBaldwinIV
[TEMP] TEMPLARS
All Glory to God
8 membersRequest to joinSupporter Clan
0-2-0Won-drawn-lost
2Wars
0Medals
Clan war games
Every clan war game this clan played, newest first. A war is two games, each with its own replay.
Winners
273rd ➔ 267th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 985 against 962.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 965
96th ➔ 66th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Team average: 985 against 962.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1013
135th ➔ 107th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 985 against 962.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1003
vs
Losers
145th ➔ 208th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 962 against 985.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 987
301st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 873
- Team average: 962 against 985.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 865
48th ➔ 67th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1019
- Team average: 962 against 985.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1011
Clan war[AVENG] vs [TEMP] · Game 2 of 2War: Drawn 1-1[AVENG] 1000 → 992 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 992
- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 1008
Winners
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 4
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 4
vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: -4
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: -4
Clan war[AVENG] vs [TEMP] · Game 1 of 2War: Drawn 1-1[AVENG] 1000 → 992 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 992
- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 1008
Winners
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: -4
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: -4
vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 4
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 4
Clan war[TEMP] vs [AVENG] · Game 2 of 2War: Drawn 1-1[TEMP] 1000 → 1000 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 1000
32 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0 · Unranked[AVENG] 1000 → 1000 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 1000
32 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0 · UnrankedWinners
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0
Clan war[TEMP] vs [AVENG] · Game 1 of 2War: Drawn 1-1[TEMP] 1000 → 1000 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 1000
32 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0 · Unranked[AVENG] 1000 → 1000 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Clan ratings: 1000 against 1000.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Rating after: 1000
32 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0 · UnrankedWinners
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0vs
Losers
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0
How this was worked out
- Rating before: 0
- Side average: 0 against 0.
- Expected result: 50%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
- Step size: 40.
- Rating after: 0
40 × (0.5 - 0.50) = 0
Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1087
- Opponent rating: 1033.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1093
vs
Losers
33rd ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Opponent rating: 1087.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1027
Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1133
- Team average: 1086 against 1021.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1139
21st ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1040
- Team average: 1086 against 1021.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1046
vs
Losers
214th ➔ 235th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 1021 against 1086.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 982
16th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1054
- Team average: 1021 against 1086.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1048
Winners
284th ➔ 273rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 983 against 996.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 966
77th ➔ 44th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 983 against 996.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1018
vs
Winners
12th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Opponent rating: 1040.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1087
vs
Losers
29th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1040
- Opponent rating: 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1033
wins 1 out of 100 games, also ez mu :D
Winners
14th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Team average: 1020 against 980.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1069
254th ➔ 226th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 978
- Team average: 1020 against 980.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 985
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 160th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 980 against 1020.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 993
278th ➔ 287th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 960
- Team average: 980 against 1020.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 953
Winners
15th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1055
- Team average: 1040 against 1001.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1062
34th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 1040 against 1001.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1033
vs
Losers
25th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Team average: 1001 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1029
270th ➔ 278th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 966
- Team average: 1001 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 959
Winners
15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1050
- Team average: 1040 against 958.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1055
33rd ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1031
- Team average: 1040 against 958.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1036
vs
Losers
286th ➔ 289th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 958 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 948
275th ➔ 280th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 958 against 1040.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 958
Winners
unranked ➔ 90th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 982.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1008
109th ➔ 78th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1000 against 982.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1009
vs
Winners
65th ➔ 45th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1003 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1000
9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1022
- Team average: 1003 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1031
unranked ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1003 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
unranked ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1003 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
vs
Losers
21st ➔ 41st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1000 against 1003.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1000
unranked ➔ 77th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1003.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
54th ➔ 94th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1000 against 1003.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 983
unranked ➔ 78th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1003.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1125
- Opponent rating: 1062.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1131
vs
Losers
15th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Opponent rating: 1125.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1056
Winners
5th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1119
- Opponent rating: 1058.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1125
vs
Losers
16th ➔ 21st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1058
- Opponent rating: 1119.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1052
Winners
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1112
- Opponent rating: 1065.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1119
vs
Losers
14th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Opponent rating: 1112.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1058
Winners
52nd ➔ 45th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Team average: 1066 against 995.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1023
6th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1126
- Team average: 1066 against 995.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1131
21st ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1056
- Team average: 1066 against 995.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1061
vs
Losers
154th ➔ 200th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 995 against 1066.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 989
129th ➔ 164th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 995 against 1066.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 992
153rd ➔ 199th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 995 against 1066.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 989
Winners
18th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1043
- Team average: 1027 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1050
51st ➔ 40th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 1027 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1019
vs
Losers
260th ➔ 269th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 984 against 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 966
138th ➔ 207th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 984 against 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 989
Winners
29th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Opponent rating: 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1040
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 138th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Opponent rating: 1033.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 993
Page 1 of 2Next