← Home

Biedzia

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 410,790 / 20,000 XP
9,210 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
998
ELO
#137
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
992
ELO
#460
13W 12L · 52%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
977
ELO
#406
0W 3L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
967
ELO
#1027
0W 4L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
866
ELO
#961
34W 79L · 30%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Beto
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Esvagt Baldur
2W 23L
8%
Rohannn.
3W 4L
43%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Biedzia & Free-Willy
1W 2L
33%
Biedzia & Esvagt Baldur & LITTO
1W 1L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Beto & CHMAAN & sardor 1997
1W 2L
33%
Beto & CHMAAN & Ideal army
0W 2L
0%
71 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 867
  • Team average: 910 against 1146.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 866
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:56·2026-10-06 21:54 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 859
  • Team average: 968 against 942.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 867
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:30:49·2026-10-06 19:52 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 867
  • Team average: 1001 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 859
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:43·2026-10-06 18:17 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 870
  • Team average: 942 against 1056.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 867
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:29·2026-10-06 12:48 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 861
  • Team average: 955 against 967.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 870
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:36·2026-10-06 11:55 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 862
  • Team average: 884 against 1058.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 861
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:57·2026-10-06 11:20 UTC
LBFME1BelfalasHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Free for all, rated against 1003. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 998
Rohan·FFA·00:38:36·2026-10-05 22:22 UTC
LBFME1Wold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 1009 against 1005.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 992
Gondor·2 versus 2·01:04:25·2026-10-05 21:16 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 871
  • Team average: 1035 against 1029.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 862
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:02·2026-10-05 19:23 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 872
  • Team average: 895 against 1151.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 871
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:20·2026-10-05 17:47 UTC