← Home

fakamaka

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 23,820 / 5,000 XP
1,180 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#511
#511
Season 2
991 pts
1W / 2L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#86
#86
Season 2
1,053 pts
25W / 19L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#212
#212
Season 2
995 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Rohannn.
4W 1L, 80% over 5 games
mk today
9W 6L
60%
radju9698
9W 6L
60%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
fakamaka & mk today & radju9698
3W 0L
100%
fakamaka & mk today & Rohannn.
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ElDictador & Escu & Laetus77
5W 0L
100%
7777 & Monarch_01 & radju9698
0W 2L
0%
59 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1060
  • Team average: 946 against 980.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1053
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:51·2026-10-07 17:18 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1049
  • Team average: 1088 against 1193.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 1060
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:33·2026-10-07 16:51 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1042
  • Team average: 1045 against 1001.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1049
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:37·2026-10-07 16:26 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1050
  • Team average: 1001 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1042
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:43·2026-10-06 18:17 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1051
  • Team average: 1007 against 1268.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1050
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:24·2026-10-06 18:00 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1041
  • Team average: 1059 against 1136.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1051
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:06·2026-10-06 17:43 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1037
  • Team average: 1018 against 927.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1041
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:49·2026-10-06 17:26 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1046
  • Team average: 1008 against 998.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1037
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:25·2026-10-06 17:08 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1055
  • Team average: 1006 against 1012.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1046
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:50·2026-10-06 16:38 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1062
  • Team average: 1021 against 1054.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1055
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:11·2026-10-06 16:05 UTC